The Dangers of Public Judgement Before Due Process in Ghana

Introduction

Public opinion shaped by media coverage now represents a critical external challenge for Ghana’s judicial system beyond courtroom pressures. This paper investigates how public sentiment together with media influence and a history of political instability threatens both judicial independence and due process principles. Sensational news coverage combined with social media trends and limited public trust has led to endangered fair trial rights in major cases. The justice system faces growing threats of distortion which simultaneously damages both legal proceedings and public trust in the system.

Historical Context and Judicial Integrity

Ghana faces challenges in establishing judicial credibility because it passed through both military rule and democratic transition in the 1990s. Judicial independence received constitutional protection under the 1992 Constitution but the endemic corruption and political interference continue to damage public confidence in the judicial system. The World Justice Project Rule of Law Index positions Ghana at position 62 among 142 countries. The rule of law deteriorated in 57% of surveyed nations including Ghana during the last year. The overall rule of law score of Ghana decreased by less than 1% according to this year’s Index. Ghana stands at position 7 among 34 countries in Sub-Saharan Africa (1)(2). The Tuffour v. Attorney-General case demonstrates public skepticism regarding the judiciary. These problems intensify when courts operate under social pressure during politically charged or prominent cases.

Media Influence and Public Perception

Media functions as a dual entity by delivering information to the public but also inadvertently creates results that affect the process. The Ghanaian media consists of state and private outlets which use episodic framing to present simplified legal information that creates biased stories (7)(8). This approach generates important consequences because media reports often make pre-trial decisions about defendants before providing inaccurate or sensationalized information (9). The distinction between reporting and editorializing continues to fade because journalists now incorporate their personal views into published news stories (10).

Social media exacerbates the problem. The competitive nature between news organizations has led to deteriorating standards in their journalistic work. News organizations frequently choose to publish first over maintaining accurate reporting during important criminal proceedings (9). The combination of witness and family member manipulation along with legal and PR team exploitation of public sentiment threatens the fairness of court proceedings (9). Current media regulations in Ghana fail to provide specific guidelines for criminal trial proceedings which creates a void that permits ethical violations (9)(10).

Societal Implications

The judicial system faces broader repercussions outside its courtrooms. Misinformation together with cyberbullying and the pursuit of viral fame have destroyed traditional social values in Ghana (5). The youth bear the most impact from social media because online trends encourage activities that violate cultural values and moral standards (5). The public has become increasingly distrustful of judges because people believe they are corrupt and politicized (2)(11). When trust decreases it damages national unity and slows down development processes. The lack of control threatens to damage both social bonds and institutional stability.

Legal Framework and Due Process Challenges

Judicial independence remains protected in Ghana’s 1992 Constitution but its indemnity clauses in the Constitution that shield past military officials from prosecution create potential problems (3)(4). The proposed judicial reform aims to reduce the Supreme Court size while establishing life tenure for judges as protection from political interference (3). The maintenance of accountability depends on powerful systems that allow public complaints and judicial discipline (2).

The Criminal Procedure Code of Ghana states that defendants should enter court as free persons but this requirement is frequently disregarded (9). As a signatory to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights Ghana must respect both the right to a fair trial and the principle of innocence until proven guilty (9). Traditional dispute resolution systems maintain widespread acceptance which sometimes creates conflicts with formal judicial procedures that make legal proceedings more complicated (4).

Global Comparisons and Policy Lessons

Other jurisdictions offer instructive comparisons. The UK maintains a rule called “sub judice” which prohibits media discussions about ongoing cases to protect the integrity of legal proceedings (9). The European Union enables citizens to request the removal of harmful digital information through their “right to be forgotten” law which strikes a balance between public interests and individual rights (9). Ghana should adopt models from these jurisdictions to strengthen judicial protection and rebuild public confidence in the judiciary.

Judicial accountability forms the foundation through which public trust develops. External influence combined with corruption cases has damaged the public’s perception of fair judicial practices (11)(12). The European Convention on Human Rights Article 6 provides crucial standards about independence together with transparency and timely justice that relate to Ghana’s reform initiatives (2)(13).

Civil Society and Public Engagement

Ghana’s civil society functions as a crucial force for both advocacy work and public education because most citizens doubt state institutions (1). Civil society has the power to support reform through its 33,000 registered organizations yet political polarization prevents them from being effective. Some civil society organizations function as platforms for partisan agendas and donor sponsorships which erode their trustworthiness (1). Several organizations demonstrate media expertise to boost demands for transparent justice through their communication channels.

Social capital that stems from alumni connections can lead to beneficial transformations but might simultaneously widen existing social differences (1). Civil society in Ghana must actively support disadvantaged populations because the Human Development Index ranking reveals the need for their assistance in health and education sectors (1).

Conclusion

The legal system of Ghana faces a crucial decision point in its current state. The legal system has achieved significant progress since the 1990s yet faces an immediate challenge to safeguard the rule of law against increasing media power and public expectations and social skepticism. Judicial integrity preservation requires three essential reforms which combine due process enhancement with ethical journalism implementation and legal framework adaptation to practical needs. The restoration of justice requires all stakeholders including lawmakers and judges together with media professionals and civil society members and the general public to take action.

Sources