Introduction
Social media platforms have grown exponentially in recent years, substantially altering how individuals communicate, share information, and engage with content online. As of October 2024, there were approximately 5.22 billion social media users worldwide, accounting for 63.8% of the global population (datareportal.com). This expansive reach underscores the integral role these platforms play in modern society.
Central to the success and functionality of social media platforms is the vast amount of user information they collect. This data encompasses personal details, preferences, behaviours, and interactions, enabling platforms to tailor content, enhance user experience, and drive targeted advertising (epic.org). However, the aggregation and utilisation of such extensive user information introduce significant security and cybersecurity challenges.
In this situation, security contagion becomes very relevant. In the realm of social media, a breach in one platform can have cascading effects, potentially exposing sensitive user data across multiple platforms and services. This interconnected vulnerability necessitates robust resource management strategies to safeguard user information and maintain platform integrity.
As new social media platforms emerge and rapidly gain popularity, they often prioritise growth and user acquisition, sometimes at the expense of comprehensive security measures (epic.org). This approach can lead to inadequate data protection protocols, making these platforms attractive targets for cyber threats. The challenge lies in balancing the drive for rapid expansion with the imperative to implement robust security frameworks that protect user information from exploitation and prevent the ripple effects of security contagion.
This paper will look at the rapidly expanding social media platforms and how the resource of user data, which is gathered and sold on a large scale, creates special vulnerabilities that might cause cybersecurity contagion, and how platforms, companies, and regulators may better manage this crucial asset to avert systemic catastrophes by concentrating on the relationship between information as a resource and the dangers of cascading cybersecurity breaches.
Mechanisms of Security Contagion
Social media platforms often integrate with third-party applications and services, creating a web of interconnected systems (fastercapital.com). A security breach in one platform can expose vulnerabilities in others, leading to a domino effect of data compromises. For instance, the 2020 incident with approximately 235 million user profiles from platforms like YouTube, TikTok, and Instagram exposed, serves as a reminder of the dangers associated with networked data (4comply.io).
Beyond technical breaches, social media platforms can facilitate behavioural contagion, where users’ actions influence others, potentially leading to the widespread sharing of personal information. A study published in Frontiers in Psychology demonstrated that exposure to certain behaviours online can shift social norms, affecting users’ own disclosure behaviours (Masur, DiFranzo & Bazarova, 2021). This can inadvertently increase privacy risks across platforms.
Within social media networks, unchecked social contagion may accelerate the spread of rumours and false information. In addition to affecting public opinion, this may have practical repercussions, such as affecting financial markets or public health reactions (trullion.com).
In 2018 for instance, it was revealed that Cambridge Analytica had harvested personal data from millions of Facebook users without consent, using it for political advertising purposes. This breach not only affected Facebook but also raised concerns about data privacy across other social media platforms, leading to increased scrutiny and regulatory actions (epic.org). Furthermore, retailers like Target have faced coordinated threats initiated on social media platforms, leading to real-world security incidents. These attacks often start with online campaigns that escalate to physical confrontations, demonstrating how online security issues can transcend into offline consequences.
The Value and Vulnerability of User Information
Social media platforms rely heavily on user information, including personal details, preferences, behaviours, and interactions, for growth, revenue, and influence which are instrumental in several key areas. These include targeted advertising, content personalisation, and product development and enhancement.
Platforms can enhance marketing campaigns by analysing user data to deliver personalised ads that generate substantial revenue. Meta, formerly Facebook, for example, generated $235 per American user annually through personalised ads alone (datapods.app). Platforms through personalised data allow curating content that aligns with individual interests, increasing engagement and time spent. This personalised experience fosters user loyalty and attracts advertisers. Then, insights from user behaviour inform the development of new features and services, allowing platforms to adapt and stay competitive in the market.
However, the aggregation and utilisation of this data introduce significant vulnerabilities, posing risks to both individuals and the broader digital ecosystem. These vulnerabilities include data breaches, unauthorised data sharing, malware and phishing attacks as well as behavioural profiling and manipulation.
Social media platforms are attractive targets for cybercriminals due to their vast amounts of personal information. Unauthorised access can lead to identity theft, financial loss, and user trust erosion. Microsoft’s LinkedIn faced a lawsuit for sharing private messages with third parties to train AI models without user consent (reuters.com). Platforms may share user data without explicit consent, as seen in the Cambridge Analytica scandal, where data was harvested for political advertising (theguardian.com). Cybercriminals use social media to distribute malware and conduct phishing attacks, compromising devices and stealing sensitive information. The interconnected nature of social networks allows rapid spread (techtarget.com). Extensive data collection creates detailed user profiles, allowing manipulation, influence, and discrimination, raising ethical concerns about privacy and autonomy.
The social media environment is dynamic, with trends evolving swiftly. Thus, there is a tendency to prioritise innovation over security as platforms must continuously adapt to these changes to remain relevant and engaging. Failure to do so can result in declining user engagement and market share. Nonetheless, the price must be paid to secure nations and user data as a vital resource.
Preventing and Mitigating Security Contagion
To harness the benefits of user information which is a critical resource while mitigating associated risks of security contagion, several actions can be taken. First, conducting periodic assessments or regular audits to identify and address vulnerabilities within the platform will go a long way (wired.com). This proactive approach ensures that potential threats are mitigated before they can be exploited.
Second, educate users on oversharing risks and guide identifying suspicious messages or links to phishing sites. Users should be taught to be cautious about sharing personal information and avoiding sensitive details, as educated users are less likely to fall victim to security threats (cisa.gov).
Third, social media platforms must adopt robust data governance practices by upholding clear communication of data collection and usage policies to users, and obtain explicit consent before collecting or sharing data, thus adhering to data protection regulations like the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) to ensure legal compliance and protect user rights.
Furthermore, implementing advanced cybersecurity protocols like encryption to protect sensitive user data both in transit and at rest. This ensures that even if data is intercepted, it remains unintelligible to unauthorised parties (flatironschool.com).
Moreso maintaining vigilant oversight of platform activities to detect and respond to suspicious behaviour promptly is the way to go. Implementing automated monitoring tools can aid in the early detection of potential cybersecurity breaches (brand.ucsb.edu) Developing regular test response strategies to ensure swift action in the event of a security incident helps (Oxley, 2011). This can be done through having a well-defined plan to minimise damage and facilitate quicker recovery.
Conclusion
As social media platforms continue to expand their influence and reliance on user information, the associated risks of cybersecurity contagion demand urgent attention. The intricate web of interconnected systems, coupled with the vulnerabilities inherent in large-scale data aggregation, underscores the necessity for robust security measures. Balancing the imperatives of innovation, growth, and user engagement with effective data protection strategies is critical to safeguarding user trust and platform integrity. By implementing proactive security protocols, fostering user education, and adhering to stringent data governance standards, social media platforms can mitigate risks, ensuring that user information is managed as a vital resource securely and responsibly.
References
Can Social Contagion Be Factored Into Regulation? | Trullion. Trullion. January 23, 2025. https://trullion.com/blog/social-contagion-regulation/
Global Social Media Statistics — DataReportal – Global Digital .. datareportal. Retrieved on January 22, 2025. https://datareportal.com/social-media-users
Hetler, A. 6 Common Social Media Privacy Issues | TechTarget. TechTarget. January 23, 2025. https://www.techtarget.com/whatis/feature/6-common-social-media-privacy-issues
Masur, P. K., DiFranzo, D. J., & Bazarova, N. N. (2021). Behavioral Contagion on Social Media: Effects of Social Norms. Design Interventions, and Critical Media Literacy on Self-Disclosure.
Meta. wired.com. January 23, 2025. https://www.wired.com/story/metas-fact-checking-partners-blindsided/
Navigating Social Media Security: Protecting a Business Against .. Flatiron School. January 23, 2025. https://flatironschool.com/blog/navigating-social-media-security-protecting-a-business-against-cyber-risks/
Oxley, A. (2011). A best practices guide for mitigating risk in the use of social media. Washington, DC: IBM Center for the Business of Government.
Revealed: 50 million Facebook profiles harvested for Cambridge .. The Guardian. January 23, 2025. https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/mar/17/cambridge-analytica-facebook-influence-us-election
Social Media Best Practices | UC Santa Barbara | Brand Guidelines. brand.ucsb.edu. January 23, 2025. https://brand.ucsb.edu/social-media/best-practices
Social Media Privacy – EPIC – Electronic Privacy Information Center. Electronic Privacy Information Centre. January 22, 2025. https://epic.org/issues/consumer-privacy/social-media-privacy/
Social Media Privacy, Scandals, & Why Platforms Don’t Care. 4Comply. January 22, 2025. https://4comply.io/articles/social-media-privacy-scandals-platforms-dont-care/
Stempel, J. Microsoft’s LinkedIn sued for disclosing customer information to train AI models. Reuters.com. January 23, 2025. https://www.reuters.com/legal/microsofts-linkedin-sued-disclosing-customer-information-train-ai-models-2025-01-22/
Understanding the Interconnectedness of Your Social Media Platforms. FasterCapital. January 22, 2025. https://fastercapital.com/content/Understanding-the-Interconnectedness-of-Your-Social-Media-Platforms.html
What your data is actually worth. Datapods. January 23, 2025. https://www.datapods.app/blogs/what-your-data-is-actually-worth
